Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Herbert Morris's influential 1968 'Persons and Punishment... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Any quest for the justification of retributive justice must start with the thought that the core of the concept is deserved punishment, not debt repayment.

    Herbert Morris's influential 1968 'Persons and Punishment' grounds retributive desert itself in the unfair advantage offenders take over law-abiding citizens, making debt repayment conceptually prior to desert.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Conceptually prior(as used in epistemology)
    Something that is logically or mentally more basic or fundamental—you need to understand it before you can understand something else.
    Debt repayment(as a model for understanding punishment)
    The idea of paying back or settling an obligation you owe, used here as a way to think about what criminals owe to society through punishment.
    Herbert Morris(as the author being cited)
    A 20th-century American legal philosopher who wrote influential work on why we punish criminals, arguing that punishment is justified when it restores fairness rather than just preventing future crimes.
    Retributive(as used in theories of punishment)
    Based on the idea that punishment should be given simply because someone deserves it for doing wrong, like 'an eye for an eye.'

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    desert(Cited as a backward-looking basis for justice that utilitarianism cannot straightforwardly accommodate.)
    What a person merits or is owed based on their past actions or conduct.
    unfair advantage(fairness-based objection to cheating)
    An advantage not permitted under the agreement between players or the set of norms by which players are expected to abide

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Any quest for the justification of retributive justice must start with the thoug...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective