Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that High moral theory is beneficial because it achieves consistency and systematic perspective in moral life.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Moral particularists like Jonathan Dancy argue that moral relevance of features is context-dependent, defeating systematic cross-case generalizations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A theory achieving consistency by overriding context-sensitive judgment produces moral errors rather than moral insight.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Bernard Williams showed that impartial systematic theories alienate agents from their ground projects, undermining integrity and authentic moral agency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A framework that corrodes the motivational structure of moral life cannot be said to benefit that moral life, even if it achieves formal consistency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
There is benefit to bringing systematic coherence to one's moral views across various facets of life.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
High moral theory provides systematicity and coherence when applied to ordinary and bioethical life.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.