Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Hilbert's distinction between formal systems and their in... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Any sufficiently strong formal theory F satisfying the conditions of the first incompleteness theorem must possess non-standard models in addition to its intended standard model.

    Hilbert's distinction between formal systems and their intended domains supports the view that the standard model N is fixed by our pre-formal grasp of the natural numbers, not by any axiom set.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Formal system(as used in logic and mathematics)
    A set of rules and symbols (like mathematical axioms) that you use to prove whether statements are true or false, similar to how a chess game has specific rules that determine what moves are legal.
    Hilbert
    # Hilbert David Hilbert was an influential German mathematician (1862-1943) who made groundbreaking contributions to many areas of mathematics and helped shape how mathematicians think about solving problems. He's famous for proposing a list of 23 major unsolved math problems in 1900, which guided mathematical research for decades and demonstrated the power of identifying important questions. His work emphasized the importance of rigorous proof and formal logical systems, influencing everything from geometry to quantum mechanics.
    Intended domain(what a formal system is meant to represent)
    The real-world things or concepts that a formal system is supposed to describe or apply to—for example, the intended domain of arithmetic rules is actual numbers.
    Pre-formal grasp(source of our understanding of natural numbers)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Understanding something intuitively or from everyday experience, before you try to write down formal rules about it—like knowing what numbers are before learning mathematical axioms.
    Standard model N(referring to actual natural numbers)
    The ordinary natural numbers (0, 1, 2, 3, ...) as we normally understand them, thought of as the 'correct' or 'standard' version that mathematical rules are supposed to match.
    axiom set(Q's foundation)
    The basic starting assumptions or rules that a logical system is built on; these are taken as true without proof.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Any sufficiently strong formal theory F satisfying the conditions of the first i...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective