Hitchcock and Knobe's pen-shortage case involves a normative violation by Piper, but conflating legal permission with causal abnormality smuggles deontic facts into ontological causal structure.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Causal abnormality(as contrasted with legal permission): When something happens in an unusual or unexpected way compared to how things normally work.
Conflating: Conflating means mixing together or treating two different things as if they were the same thing, when they're actually distinct. It's a logical error where someone blurs important differences between concepts, ideas, or situations to make an argument seem stronger than it is. For example, conflating "being critical of a policy" with "being disloyal to your country" wrongly equates two separate things.
Hitchcock and Knobe(as referenced researchers in philosophy of action): Two philosophers (Christopher Hitchcock and Joshua Knobe) who created a famous thought experiment to explore how people judge whether an action is intentional or accidental.
Normative violation(as describing Piper's action): Breaking a rule about how things should be done—basically doing something wrong according to accepted standards.

Based on where you are in your exploration