Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Hitler believed that victory over Britain would be good. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Under a consequentialist, self-indexed reading of 'ought', 'I ought to bomb London' (as said by Hitler) would have been false.

    Hitler believed that victory over Britain would be good.

    ConsequentialismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    ConsequentialismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If 'ought' is indexed to what a given agent believes to be good, then 'ought' cl...The policy Hitler pursued (bombing London) did not produce the results best-acco...There is a fact of the matter about whether bombing London versus bombing the RA...Under a consequentialist, self-indexed reading of 'ought', 'I ought to bomb Lond...

    Similar

    Player E cannot ensure a win either.77%D represents evidence that defeats those defeaters75%There is a fact of the matter about whether bombing London versus bomb...75%For D to defeat U and restore justification for B, D must provide the ...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: russell-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    However, Russell believed that judgments about what is right or what ought to be done can be given an analysis which gives them a sort of ersatz objectivity and hence the possibility of truth. If Dmitri has a reasonably determinate conception of the good, that is, a coherent set of opinions about which things are good and which bad, then although Dmitri’s opinions themselves are neither true nor false—since, despite appearances they are not really opinions at all but optative expressions of Dmit

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective