Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Holding contradictory judgments simultaneously violates b... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Emotional judgments can explain recalcitrance to reason

    Holding contradictory judgments simultaneously violates basic norms of rational agency in ways that make the posited mechanism explanatorily incoherent.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Rational agency requires coherence: agents must have stable dispositions to act on their commitments.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Contradictory judgments undermine explanatory power because they give no determinate prediction of behavior.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Norms of rationality are constitutive of agency itself, not merely regulative constraints on it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Humans routinely hold contradictory implicit and explicit beliefs without losing rational agency status.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Compartmentalization and context-sensitivity can preserve agency coherence despite surface contradictions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Rationality norms may be aspirational ideals rather than necessary conditions for being an agent at all.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Compartmentalization and context-sensitivity can preserve agency coherence despi...Contradictory judgments undermine explanatory power because they give no determi...Emotional judgments can explain recalcitrance to reasonHumans routinely hold contradictory implicit and explicit beliefs without losing...
    +3 moreShow less
    Norms of rationality are constitutive of agency itself, not merely regulative co...Rational agency requires coherence: agents must have stable dispositions to act ...Rationality norms may be aspirational ideals rather than necessary conditions fo...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit