Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    HP1 and HP2 are not species of a common genus but distinc... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→HP1 (harm causation principle) is narrower than HP2 (harm prevention principle) because HP1 is a proper part of HP2.

    HP1 and HP2 are not species of a common genus but distinct normative principles with different justificatory structures.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.HP1 and HP2 appeal to fundamentally different normative grounds: one to consequences, the other to duties or virtues.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Their justificatory structures require distinct types of evidence and reasoning that don't reduce to a common framework.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Genus-species relationships presuppose shared essential features that HP1 and HP2 demonstrably lack.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Both HP1 and HP2 function as action-guiding norms that claim rational authority—a common generic feature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Many apparent differences in justification collapse under scrutiny; both ultimately appeal to human flourishing or well-being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Denying genus-species relations requires stronger evidence than mere structural differences, which exist between all norms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Rights & Liberty1 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Both HP1 and HP2 function as action-guiding norms that claim rational authority—...Denying genus-species relations requires stronger evidence than mere structural ...Genus-species relationships presuppose shared essential features that HP1 and HP...HP1 (harm causation principle) is narrower than HP2 (harm prevention principle) ...
    +3 moreShow less
    HP1 and HP2 appeal to fundamentally different normative grounds: one to conseque...Many apparent differences in justification collapse under scrutiny; both ultimat...Their justificatory structures require distinct types of evidence and reasoning ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit