Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Human beings require a rational and sensory sign system (language) to communicate intellectual content to one another.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Mathematical and logical truths are grasped through rational intuition that is independent of any particular sensory sign system.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Leibniz and Frege demonstrate that logical relations hold necessarily prior to and independent of linguistic formulation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If intellectual content can be apprehended directly through reason, sensory signs are instruments of convenience, not necessary conditions for transmission.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Wittgenstein's rule-following considerations show that no finite set of sensory signs uniquely determines the intellectual content it is meant to convey.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If sensory signs underdetermine intellectual content, then the actual transmission of determinate intellectual content cannot be fully explained by the sensory sign system itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Humans derive intellectual content from sensation directly or through sensory communication from other humans.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Nothing can be transferred from one reasoning mind to another except by sensory means.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Unlike angels, demons, and other animals, humans lack a non-sensory means of mind-to-mind transmission.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.