Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Human freedom, as defended by Alvin Plantinga's libertarian free will theodicy, entails the genuine capacity to permanently reject God.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If God is omniscient, He knew before creation that some would reject Him permanently; this foreknowledge seems to undermine their freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Libertarian free will is metaphysically problematic: uncaused human choices conflict with physical causation governing human brains.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
An all-powerful God could create beings with genuine freedom who never permanently reject Him—so freedom doesn't require permanent rejection.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Genuine freedom requires the ability to do otherwise; a predetermined acceptance of God would be illusory, not authentic choice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A world with libertarian free agents capable of real rejection is metaphysically richer and morally more significant than one without.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Divine omniscience of free choices doesn't determine them; God knows what agents will freely choose without causing that choice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.