Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Human languages are manifestations of cosmic articulation rather than purely human constructs.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Languages exhibit arbitrary sign-signified relations (Saussure) that vary radically across cultures, inconsistent with a unified cosmic source.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If cosmic articulation generated all languages equally, we would expect structural universality, but linguistic diversity falsifies this prediction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Wittgenstein's rule-following considerations establish that linguistic meaning is constituted by communal practice, not prior metaphysical structures.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Any cosmic source of language is epistemically inaccessible without the human practices that already constitute linguistic meaning, making the cosmic grounding explanatorily redundant.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The process of articulation of the Dharma by the hosshin generates everything in the cosmos.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Human languages are among the things generated by that articulation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Therefore human languages are manifestations of the hosshin's cosmic articulation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42