Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Human nature is that which exists in human beings indepen... — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Human nature is not good

    Human nature is that which exists in human beings independently of conscious activity, not what is produced by conscious activity

    Virtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue Ethics

    Related

    Human beings are not already good but must work at becoming goodHuman nature is not goodTherefore, goodness is not already present in human nature independently of cons...

    Similar

    Human nature can only be disclosed by philosophy, imposed as belief, a...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    79%
    A nature-fulfillment theory of well-being requires that beings have a ...79%
    If nature is not to be in vain, the faculties of an animal must be cap...78%
    Therefore, goodness is not already present in human nature independent...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ethics-chinese
    View source passageHide passage
    Part of Xunzi’s argument against Mencius is that human nature is not what is produced by conscious activity but rather that which is already there in human beings independently of conscious activity. Since it is clear that human beings are not already good but must work at it, it is clear that human nature cannot be good. When Mencius is attributed the water-metaphor view of the human inclination toward goodness, Xunzi’s criticism has a point. Becoming good does not seem to be merely a matter of

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective