Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Human wickedness does not always require divine punishment.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Self-ruin from vice is often imperceptible to the wicked agent, who mistakes corrupt pleasures for genuine flourishing (Plato, Republic 580d-588a).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Punishment requires not merely harm but recognition of desert; unfelt self-ruin lacks the retributive structure that justice demands.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Wicked acts harm third parties whose claims to justice cannot be satisfied merely by the agent's internal degradation (Kant, Metaphysics of Morals 6:331-337).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A theory of punishment grounded solely in the perpetrator's self-harm systematically ignores the victim's standing as a rights-bearing moral subject.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Wickedness of itself ruins the life of those who act wickedly.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Self-ruin constitutes a sufficient punishment for wicked action.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.