Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Humans can quickly and effortlessly appraise complicated ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Humans possess an innate moral grammar analogous to linguistic grammar, which underlies normative moral judgments.

    Humans can quickly and effortlessly appraise complicated moral scenarios, such as variations on trolley problems.

    Consciousness & MindMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Philosophy of Language
    2 linked

    Related

    Experimental evidence shows that humans have such moral intuitions and that thos...Humans possess an innate moral grammar analogous to linguistic grammar, which un...The process of issuing normative judgments involves an unconscious appeal to rul...These appraisals are independent of superficial features such as how the scenari...

    Similar

    The argument is grounded in the human capacity to rapidly evaluate com...80%Investigating the features to which people respond when having moral i...74%To use examples, one must already be able to determine the moral statu...74%Particularists allow that moral experience and consideration of other ...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: experimental-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    Unlike the traditional poverty of the stimulus argument, this version does not rely on developmental evidence, but on our ability to quickly and effortlessly appraise complicated scenarios, such as variations on trolley problems, in a way that is independent of their superficial features (e.g., the way they are described), and then issue normative judgments. The postulated intervening step is like the unconscious appeal to rules of grammar, and the evidence for such a step must come from experim

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective