Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Humans cannot gain any true knowledge
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Zhuangzi's perspectivalism entails that partial, situated knowledge is genuine knowledge, not a failed approximation of absolute knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If finite knowers can reliably navigate the world through dao-aligned practice, then functional truth-tracking constitutes a valid form of knowing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The argument conflates exhaustive knowledge of all things with true knowledge of particular things, an equivocation on 'knowledge'.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Wang Yangming's doctrine of liangzhi demonstrates that moral and perceptual knowledge can be certain without requiring infinite comprehension.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Knowledge is infinite
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The human capacity for comprehension is too limited to grasp infinite knowledge
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.