Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Humans have direct perceptual access only to what is perc... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Humans cannot attain clear knowledge of imperceptible things, but can make reasonable judgments about them from perceptual signs.

    Humans have direct perceptual access only to what is perceptible.

    PerceptionSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPerception

    Connections

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Clear knowledge of imperceptible things belongs to the gods alone.Humans cannot attain clear knowledge of imperceptible things, but can make reaso...Sensation provides signs from which humans can draw inferences (tekmairesthai).

    Similar

    If perception cannot operate, nothing can be known perceptually80%Visual perception does not provide privileged access restricted to one...79%Direct perception does not provide access to objects outside the mind.79%Animals have only sense perception.77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: alcmaeon
    View source passageHide passage
    Such skepticism about human knowledge is characteristic of one strand of early Greek thought. Both Alcmaeon’s predecessors (e.g., Xenophanes B34) and his successors (e.g., Philolaus B6) made similar contrasts between divine and human knowledge, but in Alcmaeon’s case, as in these other cases, we do not have enough evidence to be sure what he intended. Most of the subjects that Alcmaeon went on to discuss in his book could not be settled by a direct appeal to sense perception (e.g., the functioni

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective