Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Hume argues that reason is and ought only to be the slave of the passions, making reason instrumentally subordinate to instinct rather than its governor.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Reason demonstrably overrides passions: people resist hunger, suppress anger, and forgo pleasure through rational deliberation regularly.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim requires reason to identify which passions to serve, implying reason operates prior to and independently of passion's direction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Hume's own use of systematic argumentation to defend this view assumes reason can persuade us—contradicting that it merely serves passion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Empirically, humans consistently pursue goals set by emotions (survival, reproduction, social bonding) rather than pure logical calculation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Reason alone cannot generate motivational force; it requires desires to direct action toward any end whatsoever.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Acknowledging reason's instrumental role clarifies moral responsibility: we're accountable for how well we pursue our passions, not the passions themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.