Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Hume demonstrated that causal ordering of impressions arises from habitual association, not from judgment, yet still tracks mind-independent regularities.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Habitual association alone cannot distinguish genuine causal regularities from mere coincidental correlations in limited experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If causation depends only on subjective habit, not rational judgment, we cannot explain why different observers converge on same causal claims.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Tracking mind-independent regularities requires some mechanism connecting habits to external world; bare association provides none.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Habitual association explains causal judgment's psychological origin without requiring mysterious a priori rational intuition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Repeated constant conjunctions between events provide empirical basis for causal beliefs that reliably track actual regularities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Non-rational habit formation can still generate beliefs aligned with mind-independent facts through natural selection pressures.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.