Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Hume demonstrated that what we call 'will' is itself produced by prior impressions, passions, and causal antecedents beyond the agent's control.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Hume conflates the causal influence on will with the elimination of will itself; influenced decisions can still be genuinely voluntary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The very intelligibility of moral responsibility and rational deliberation suggests we possess a will not wholly reducible to prior causes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hume's bundle theory of mind may be empirically inadequate; unified agency could be a real feature not detected by passive observation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Empirical introspection reveals only fleeting impressions and emotional states, never a ghostly 'will' standing apart from them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If will were uncaused, it would be random and therefore not genuinely 'ours'—causation by prior states is necessary for agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Neuroscience confirms that neural activity precedes conscious decision-making, supporting Hume's claim about causal antecedence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.