Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Hume demonstrates that reason alone is inert and cannot motivate action without prior sentiment or passion.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Rational agents act on beliefs about their own well-being without requiring independent sentiment; reason itself can identify and motivate self-interest.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Hume conflates motivation with phenomenological feeling; rational conviction that X is necessary can move us to act without conscious passion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Intellectual commitments and value judgments constitute their own form of rational motivation distinct from Humean 'passion' or sentiment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Pure logical reasoning about abstract facts (e.g., mathematical truths) produces no desire to act without emotional investment in outcomes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
We can rationally understand moral duties yet remain unmoved to act; only sentiment like sympathy actually compels moral behavior.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Reason merely identifies means to ends; it cannot establish why we should desire any end without prior passion determining value.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.