Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Hume's account in 'Of the Standard of Taste' grounds aest... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The power of discerning beauty cannot be identified with any of the five external senses

    Hume's account in 'Of the Standard of Taste' grounds aesthetic discernment in the refinement of ordinary sensory organs through practice, not a separate inner sense.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Aesthetic judgment improves through exposure and practice, as evidenced by wine tasters and art critics developing better discrimination over time.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.No evidence supports a distinct aesthetic sense organ; taste judgments employ standard sensory capacities (sight, hearing) refined through experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Positing a separate inner sense creates unnecessary theoretical entities when ordinary sensory refinement explains aesthetic competence adequately.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Not all sensory refinement produces aesthetic judgment; discriminating rancid wine differs fundamentally from judging a painting's aesthetic merit.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Hume himself appeals to 'delicacy of taste' as a special capacity, suggesting something beyond mere sensory acuity or mechanical practice effects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Aesthetic responses involve evaluative, emotional, and imaginative dimensions that transcend ordinary organ sensitivity and seem to require distinct faculties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics1 linked

    Related

    Aesthetic judgment improves through exposure and practice, as evidenced by wine ...Aesthetic responses involve evaluative, emotional, and imaginative dimensions th...Hume himself appeals to 'delicacy of taste' as a special capacity, suggesting so...No evidence supports a distinct aesthetic sense organ; taste judgments employ st...
    +3 moreShow less
    Not all sensory refinement produces aesthetic judgment; discriminating rancid wi...Positing a separate inner sense creates unnecessary theoretical entities when or...The power of discerning beauty cannot be identified with any of the five externa...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit