Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Hume's argument in the Dialogues Concerning Natural Relig... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The alternation of confirmations and doubts concerning the immortality of the soul is part of God's providential design

    Hume's argument in the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion shows that attributing ambiguous phenomena to providence commits the fallacy of retrofitting design onto neutral evidence.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Ambiguous phenomena(the type of evidence being misinterpreted)
    Natural events or observations that could be explained in multiple ways or don't have a single clear meaning.
    Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion(the specific work being referenced)
    A famous book by Hume written as conversations between characters debating whether the universe shows signs of being designed by an intelligent creator.
    Hume(as the main philosopher discussed in this statement)
    David Hume was an 18th-century Scottish philosopher who argued that human knowledge comes from experience and observation rather than pure reasoning alone.
    Neutral evidence(contrasted with how the evidence is being misused)
    Facts or observations that don't inherently favor one explanation over another until someone interprets them.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Providence(theological concept)
    God's plan for and control over future events; the idea that God guides everything that happens.
    Retrofitting design(the specific logical mistake being identified)
    Taking something neutral or ambiguous and fitting it into a predetermined conclusion after the fact, rather than letting the evidence naturally point to that conclusion.
    fallacy(Whately's definition, Elements of Logic, Bk. III, intro.)
    Any unsound mode of arguing which appears to demand conviction and to be decisive of the question at hand, when in fairness it is not

    Connections

    2 topics

    Afterlife & Death1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    The alternation of confirmations and doubts concerning the immortality of the so...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective