Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Hume's Dialogues establish that inferring a divine intelligent source from observed order commits the fallacy of assuming the explanandum (ordered universe) in the explanans (an ordering God).

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.God's mental properties needn't require explanation the way physical universes do; mental capacities aren't explained by prior order.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Explaining Y by appeal to X isn't circular if X and Y are distinct categories; mental agency differs fundamentally from physical arrangement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hume's critique conflates two questions: whether the inference is formally valid and whether it's the best available explanation of order.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.A God capable of creating order must itself possess the order and design being explained, making the explanation circular.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Philo's dialogues show we assume divine intelligence without explaining why God's mind exhibits the order needing explanation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The argument takes 'orderliness' as a brute fact in God while demanding explanation for orderliness in nature—inconsistent standards.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.