Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Hume's regularity theory establishes that causal relations require observable contiguity and succession between cause and effect across instances.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Constant conjunction alone cannot distinguish genuine causes from mere coincidences or common effects of a third cause.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Singular causal claims (this match caused this flame) refer to particular events, not repeated patterns or laws.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Quantum mechanics shows indeterministic but causally efficacious processes that violate strict regularity requirements.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Observable patterns are all we can directly access; unobservable 'powers' or 'necessities' lack empirical grounding.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Regularity theory avoids metaphysical excess by explaining causation through constant conjunction without hidden mechanisms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Science successfully predicts and controls phenomena using repeated patterns, validating regularity as causally sufficient.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.