Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Hume's regularity theory of causation (Enquiry VII) demon... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Every mode necessarily follows from something else

    Hume's regularity theory of causation (Enquiry VII) demonstrates that necessary connection between cause and effect is a psychological projection, not an objective metaphysical relation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.We never observe necessary connection itself, only constant conjunction of events in experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The mind's habit of associating regularly-conjoined events explains our causal intuitions without metaphysical necessity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Positing unobservable necessary connections violates empiricist principles requiring grounding in sensory experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Regularity alone cannot explain why we project necessity rather than mere correlation onto causation universally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Physical laws exhibit persistent regularities independent of human observers, suggesting causation transcends psychology.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hume's account conflates epistemological limits (what we know) with metaphysical claims (what exists objectively).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    David Hume(as referenced in the statement)
    An 18th-century Scottish philosopher who argued that our desires and emotions, not reason alone, drive our actions and decisions.
    Enquiry VII(the source where Hume presents this theory)
    A section (Part VII) of Hume's book *An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding*, where he discusses causation.
    Metaphysical relation(as used in metaphysics)
    A deep, fundamental connection between things that goes beyond just one event causing another—it's about how things are connected in their basic nature.
    Psychological projection(describing where Hume believes our sense of causation comes from)
    When our mind creates or imposes something onto the world that isn't actually there—we're projecting our own thoughts or expectations onto reality.
    Regularity theory of causation(as the main subject of the statement)
    A theory saying that one thing causes another simply because whenever the first thing happens, the second thing regularly follows it—there's no deeper 'power' making it happen, just a reliable pattern.
    causation(Lewis's counterfactual theory of causation)
    Event C causes event E if and only if there exists a chain C, D1, …, Dn, E such that each member (except C) is counterfactually dependent on the preceding event; causation is the ancestral of counterfactual dependence
    necessary connection(Hume's account of the origin of the concept of causation, Treatise I.III.14)
    The felt sense of the mind being pulled from one impression to an associated idea, which the mind then projects onto external objects as if it were a connection among the objects themselves

    Connections

    1 linked claim · 2 topics

    Causation1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked
    Every mode necessarily follows from something else

    Related

    Every mode necessarily follows from something else

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Hume's account conflates epistemological limits (what we know) with metaphysical...
    Physical laws exhibit persistent regularities independent of human observers, su...
    Positing unobservable necessary connections violates empiricist principles requi...
    +3 moreShow less
    Regularity alone cannot explain why we project necessity rather than mere correl...The mind's habit of associating regularly-conjoined events explains our causal i...We never observe necessary connection itself, only constant conjunction of event...