Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Hume's restriction of 'reason' to theoretical representation illicitly excludes practical rationality as a legitimate evaluative standard.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Hume's account of practical reason concerns instrumental rationality, which legitimately evaluates means; goals themselves remain desire-based, not rational.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Calling practical deliberation 'rational' conflates logical consistency with rationality proper; it obscures Hume's actual distinction between reason and passion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Practical reason can be non-evaluative: reasoning about how to achieve desires needn't presuppose independent evaluative standards beyond desire satisfaction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Practical reasoning about means-ends relationships involves evaluative standards (efficiency, coherence) distinct from theoretical representation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Excluding practical rationality from evaluative standards leaves no rational basis for criticizing irrational action or incoherent preferences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Agents demonstrably exercise rational judgment when deliberating about goals, not merely executing pre-given desires mechanically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42