Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Hume's 'standard of taste' shows that aesthetic verdicts vary systematically with cultural training, personal temperament, and historical context.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Some aesthetic responses (symmetry, natural landscapes) appear cross-culturally consistent, suggesting universal substrates underlying taste variation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Hume's 'delicacy of taste' posits that refinement reveals genuine aesthetic truths rather than merely reflects cultural conditioning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If taste were purely systematic products of training, we couldn't explain why trained judges sometimes reject prevailing cultural norms.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Aesthetic preferences demonstrably shift across cultures: medieval beauty standards differ radically from contemporary ones, supporting systematic variation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Expert judges in any field (wine, music, visual art) show training effects, suggesting taste refinement follows learnable patterns, not innate universals.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Historical records reveal how exposure to new genres reshapes what populations find beautiful, proving context actively shapes aesthetic response.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.