Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Hume showed that causal necessity is not found in events themselves but projected by the mind from observed regularities.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Some regularities (like gravity) maintain necessity independent of human minds observing or projecting it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If causality were mere projection, different minds would consistently project contradictory causal relations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Physical constraints on objects (e.g., solidity preventing interpenetration) suggest necessity in things themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
We never directly observe necessity in nature; we only observe constant conjunction of events in sequence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The mind's expectation that regularities will continue is psychological, not derived from external objects.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Causal claims go beyond observable data and require mental inference or habit to connect separate events.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.