Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Hume was almost certainly aware of the relevant Newtonian... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Hume's ninth rule of causation has Newtonian intellectual debts

    Hume was almost certainly aware of the relevant Newtonian passage because Hume discusses the proper meaning of 'attraction' with explicit appeal to Newton's intentions in EHU 7.1.25

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    EHU 7.1.25(as a citation to a specific text location)
    A reference system for locating a specific passage in Hume's book 'Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding'—like a chapter and verse number that lets scholars point to exactly which part they're quoting.
    Hume(as the main philosopher discussed in this statement)
    David Hume was an 18th-century Scottish philosopher who argued that human knowledge comes from experience and observation rather than pure reasoning alone.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Newton's intentions(Hume's interpretation of Newton's meaning)
    What Newton meant or tried to communicate when he wrote about a scientific concept—in this case, what he intended 'attraction' to mean.
    Newtonian
    "Newtonian" refers to ideas and laws developed by Sir Isaac Newton, a famous English scientist from the 1600s. It describes the traditional way we understand how objects move and interact through forces—for example, why a ball falls down when you drop it or why pushing something makes it move faster. Newton's ideas were so successful at explaining the physical world that "Newtonian" became the foundation of physics for over 200 years, though modern physics has since refined his theories for extreme situations like very fast speeds or tiny particles.
    attraction(Newtonian mechanics; Hume's interpretation of Newton)
    A term used by Newton whose proper meaning Newton explicitly clarifies in the Scholium following Proposition 69, Book I, Section 11 of the Principia; discussed by Hume in EHU 7.1.25

    Related

    Hume's ninth rule of causation has Newtonian intellectual debtsNewton implicitly uses a proportionality-between-cause-and-effect rule throughou...Newton transforms a version of Hume's seventh rule into a proportionality-emphas...

    Similar

    The passage offers an account of what Newton means by 'attraction'91%Hume discusses Newton's meaning of 'attraction' with explicit appeal t...91%The proportionality passage in the Principia (Scholium following Propo...72%Pyrrho's statement about the nature of things in the Aristocles passag...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: hume-newton
    View source passageHide passage
    Hume’s ninth rule also has Newtonian debts. Since the time of Aristotle, many philosophers have asserted proportionality between cause and effect in one fashion or another. Hume’s ninth rule echoes, for instance, a principle Leibniz uses quite frequently: the principle of the equality of cause and effect. It is the basis of arguments Leibniz gives for his conservation principles (e.g., Specimen Dynamicum). But Leibniz’s formulation is in terms of equality and not proportionality. Unlike Leibniz

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective