Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Humean contingency of causal relations applies to causal relata, not to the grounding relation between a property and its causal profile.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If grounding relations are non-contingent, they need justification distinct from causation, but no principled difference between them is evident.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Properties could have had different causal profiles in different possible worlds, suggesting grounding relations are equally Humean-contingent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The distinction assumes grounding is non-empirical while causation is, but both seem equally open to empirical discovery and modal variation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Causal relations between distinct events are contingent (Hume showed this), but properties have their causal profiles essentially or necessarily.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Grounding is a metaphysical relation of constitution, unlike causation between separate relata, so it needn't obey Humean contingency constraints.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A property's identity just is its causal profile—changing the profile changes the property, making the connection non-contingent by necessity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42