Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    IBE claims that more explanatory theories receive greater... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) either contradicts itself or equivocates, and therefore cannot coherently describe inductive or evidential support.

    IBE claims that more explanatory theories receive greater inductive or evidential support (i.e., are more likely to be true).

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Notable Defenders

    van Fraassencontemporaryvan Fraassen 1983, Sect. 2

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language3 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    A more informative theory cannot be more likely to be true than a less informati...Any account of evidential support that requires greater informativeness to groun...Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) either contradicts itself or equivocates...It is part of the meaning of 'explanation' that if one theory is more explanator...

    Similar

    A theory with more content has more ways of being false than a theory ...81%A theory that is an extension of another theory has more ways of being...81%A theory can be more explanatory without being more informative80%A more informative theory cannot be more likely to be true than a less...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: abduction
    View source passageHide passage
    The first objection has as a premise that it is part of the meaning of “explanation” that if one theory is more explanatory than another, the former must be more informative than the latter (see, e.g., van Fraassen 1983, Sect. 2). The alleged problem then is that it is “an elementary logical point that a more informative theory cannot be more likely to be true [and thus] attempts to describe inductive or evidential support through features that require information (such as ‘Inference to the Best

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective