Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If 0.51 probability derived from statistical evidence is ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A finding of liability based on bare statistical evidence is unsafe and therefore should not be entered.

    If 0.51 probability derived from statistical evidence is insufficient for liability, then equally low-probability conclusions from witness testimony must fail by the same standard.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Evidentiary standards should apply uniformly across evidence types to avoid arbitrary epistemic double standards in legal reasoning.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Both statistical and testimonial evidence ultimately express degrees of belief; treating them differently lacks principled justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If 0.51 probability is below the preponderance threshold, witness testimony offering equivalent confidence should similarly fail.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Witness testimony and statistical evidence differ in kind: testimony provides narrative coherence and cross-examinable credibility assessments.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A single eyewitness can rationally convince jurors beyond 0.51 through perceived sincerity, whereas raw statistics lack this epistemic force.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Legal standards appropriately reflect how humans actually evaluate evidence, not abstract probability equivalence across different modalities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Epistemological standard(as used in philosophy of knowledge)
    A rule or threshold for deciding what counts as reliable knowledge or good enough evidence to believe something.
    Liability(Legal doctrine)
    A legal status that obtains if and only if both obligation and action are true; obligation and action are jointly necessary and sufficient conditions for liability
    Statistical evidence(as used in epistemology and philosophy of science)
    Information gathered from data and numbers that helps us figure out whether something is probably true or false.
    Witness testimony(as used in legal reasoning)
    A statement made by someone who directly saw or experienced something, given as evidence in court or an investigation.
    probability(as used in mathematics and logic)
    A number between 0 and 1 that describes how likely something is to happen; 0.5 means 50% chance, 1 means certain, 0 means impossible.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    A finding of liability based on bare statistical evidence is unsafe and therefor...A single eyewitness can rationally convince jurors beyond 0.51 through perceived...Both statistical and testimonial evidence ultimately express degrees of belief; ...Evidentiary standards should apply uniformly across evidence types to avoid arbi...
    +3 moreShow less
    If 0.51 probability is below the preponderance threshold, witness testimony offe...Legal standards appropriately reflect how humans actually evaluate evidence, not...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Witness testimony and statistical evidence differ in kind: testimony provides na...