Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If a belief system is massively false, maximizing truth assignments misidentifies content rather than revealing it, inverting the explanatory order.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Truth-tracking is precisely how we identify content: false beliefs about X still have X as their content precisely because they aim at truth.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Even massively false systems preserve referential relations through error patterns, so truth-maximization reveals rather than inverts meaning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Without truth-based methods, we have no principled way to distinguish systematic error from content misidentification at all.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Content is determined by causal-historical relations to the world, not by truth-value assignments within a system.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A radically false belief system's internal coherence can mask systematic distortion of what its terms actually refer to.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Maximizing true sentences in a false framework optimizes the wrong target, like perfecting a map of a territory that doesn't exist.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.