Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If a central figure in early modern epistemology demotes sensory intuition and denies intellectual intuition, intuition cannot ground the tradition as a whole.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
A tradition need not be grounded in what its central figures explicitly endorse; it can be grounded in what they implicitly rely upon.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Demoting sensory intuition need not eliminate intuition's grounding role—intellectual intuition alone suffices as a foundational source.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Early modern epistemology may rest on multiple heterogeneous foundations rather than a single unified grounding principle like intuition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Descartes centrally rejected sensory intuition as unreliable and denied intellectual intuition's universality, yet shaped early modern epistemology.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If intuition cannot ground a tradition, alternative foundations (reason, method, doubt) must do so instead, but these weren't universally accepted.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Early modern epistemology exhibits persistent appeals to intuitive justification despite key figures' theoretical denials of its validity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.