Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If a definition excludes the paradigm case of the phenomenon it purports to define, the definition commits the fallacy of ativyāpti or avyāpti recognized in Indian logic.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Paradigm cases may shift with context or theoretical development; excluding old paradigms isn't fallacious if justified by better understanding.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Some valid definitions intentionally narrow or revise ordinary concepts for technical purposes without committing logical errors.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The charge of avyāpti assumes 'paradigm case' is objective and fixed, but cases are often theory-laden and contestable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Definitions serve to capture the essential nature of phenomena; excluding paradigm cases means the definition fails its basic purpose.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Paradigm cases are logically prior—they determine what counts as the phenomenon, so any definition contradicting them is self-refuting.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Indian logicians identified this pattern systematically because it reveals genuine conceptual incoherence, not mere disagreement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42