Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If a principle entails an invalid formula, that principle... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Connected to 2 discussions

    Supports→The Converse Barcan Formula (CBF) is invalid in KQML
    Supports→The full necessitism principle (Box-N) is invalid in KQML

    If a principle entails an invalid formula, that principle is itself invalid

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Personal Identity1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    An individual 'a' in the actual world might not exist in some other world, meani...Box-N entails the principle N, which states that everything that exists is neces...CBF entails the principle N, which states that everything that exists is necessa...N is invalid in KQML because world domains can vary across possible worlds
    +2 moreShow less
    The Converse Barcan Formula (CBF) is invalid in KQMLThe full necessitism principle (Box-N) is invalid in KQML

    Similar

    The principle N — that everything is necessarily identical to somethin...79%The full necessitism principle (Box-N) is invalid in KQML79%If an argument's logical principle invalidates widely accepted and unc...79%These two principles cannot both be satisfied simultaneously in the Ri...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: possibilism-actualism
    View source passageHide passage
    As we also saw in §3.3, CBF entails the principle N that everything (i.e., everything there happens to be) is necessarily identical to something. And, obviously, so too does the full necessitism principle \(\Box\textbf{N}\). But N is clearly invalid in KQML: because world domains can vary, an individual \(a\) in the actual world might not exist in another world, i.e., it might be that nothing is identical to \(a\) in some worlds.[52] Hence, since N is invalid in KQML, so are CBF and \(\Box\

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective