Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If a principle is necessarily presupposed by any possible experience, it cannot be merely conventional in Schlick's deflationary sense.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Necessity for experience need not entail metaphysical necessity—it may reflect only human cognitive architecture.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Schlick's deflationism denies truth-conditions to conventions, but this doesn't require them to be eliminable from practice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A principle can be indispensable functionally while remaining conventional in origin or justification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Necessary presuppositions of experience have constitutive rather than merely stipulative force.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Schlick's conventionalism treats principles as interchangeable linguistic choices without cognitive cost.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If a principle structures all possible experience, rejecting it makes experience itself unintelligible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42