Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If a problem can be discovered rather than constructed, its existence cannot depend on the inquiry that reveals it.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Discovery language itself may be metaphorical; identifying a problem could constitute its emergence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Problems require a framework of values or interests; without inquiry, no framework interprets phenomena as problems.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The distinction between discovering and constructing problems collapses under examination of social problems.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Mathematical truths like prime numbers exist independently of mathematicians discovering them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Discovery presupposes a discoverer finding something that was already present, not creating it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If inquiry created problems, different inquiries would create different problems, contradicting objectivity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.