Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If a proposition about the future is true, it is true immutably and inevitably
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
A proposition can be true at one time and false at another if the future it describes is genuinely open and contingent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
William of Ockham argued that future contingent propositions lack determinate truth values, making immutability inapplicable to them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If 'Socrates will run' has no fixed truth value until the event occurs, the inference to immutability presupposes what it must prove.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Aristotle's sea-battle argument in De Interpretatione 9 establishes that bivalence need not apply to future contingent statements.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If future contingents are neither determinately true nor false, then a true future proposition cannot be immutably true, since its truth status is itself unsettled.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If 'Socrates will run' is true, no instant can be found when it would be false
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A proposition that cannot be false at any instant is immutably true
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.