Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If a seriously unfair institution could nevertheless maxi... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The idealist consequentialist proposal implies that people would deserve burdens allocated by a seriously unfair but utility-maximizing institution, even if that institution were not in place

    If a seriously unfair institution could nevertheless maximize utility, then under this proposal its allocations count as deserved

    ConsequentialismJustice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentConsequentialism

    Related

    The idealist consequentialist proposal implies that people would deserve burdens...The proposal adopts a conception of ideality tied to consequentialist principlesThis implication holds regardless of whether the institution is actually instant...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The idealist consequentialist proposal implies that people would deser...80%It would be unfair to allocate a resource to A if B could genuinely be...76%The Bergson-Samuelson approach is incomplete because it lacks specific...72%Educational institutions organized according to equality of opportunit...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: desert
    View source passageHide passage
    Unfortunately, with this conception of ideality in place, the proposal seems to inherit some of the defects of the simpler consequentialist approach. It implies, for example, that if it is possible for there to be a seriously unfair but nevertheless utility maximizing institution, then people would deserve the burdens allocated to them by the rules of that institution, even if it were not in place.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective