If Absolute Idealism can be sublated into a higher synthesis, it cannot coherently claim to be the governing framework immune to the relative/absolute distinction it imposes on others.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Absolute Idealism(The position under critique; associated with the claim that individual interests ultimately coincide at the level of Reality.): The metaphysical view that at the level of Reality all individual minds are united in, or participate in, a single larger mind-like whole.
Coherently(as describing how these functions work together): In a way that is logically consistent and doesn't contradict itself.
Governing framework(what Absolute Idealism claims to be): A fundamental system or set of rules that serves as the foundation for understanding or explaining how something works.
Relative/absolute distinction(the key divide that the statement argues creates a logical problem): The difference between things that depend on something else (relative) and things that are independent and complete in themselves (absolute).

Based on where you are in your exploration