Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If Adam survived as only one twin, there would need to be... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Adam (the original embryo) does not survive twinning as either or both twins.

    If Adam survived as only one twin, there would need to be a non-arbitrary reason to identify Adam with one twin rather than the other, but both twins are qualitatively identical to Adam, so no such reason exists.

    BioethicsPersonal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsPersonal Identity

    Key Terms

    Identity (philosophical)(as used in metaphysics and logic)
    When two things are actually the same thing, not just similar—like how Clark Kent and Superman are identical (the same person with two names).
    Non-arbitrary(describing whether there's a fair, logical way to measure contributions)
    A way of deciding something that's based on clear, objective reasons rather than just picking whatever you want without justification.
    qualitatively identical

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (Both twins are qualitatively identical to Adam, making it arbitrary to identify one twin as Adam and not the other.)
    Having the same properties or characteristics, without necessarily being numerically the same individual.

    Related

    Adam (the original embryo) does not survive twinning as either or both twins.If Adam survived as both twins, there would be one human being living two distin...The only remaining option is that Adam does not survive twinning.

    Similar

    If Adam survived as both twins, there would be one human being living ...87%In twinning, the original embryo (Adam) cannot survive as both twins, ...81%Adam does not survive twinning, meaning twinning produces two new huma...79%Adam (the original embryo) does not survive twinning as either or both...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: identity-ethics
    View source passageHide passage
    References to identity in this debate come from objectors to this argument, who apply the argument from fission to a real life version of it, namely, twinning. An embryo might split any time generally before the two-week point in fetal development, and those two embryos could develop into fully formed infant twins. The question for the advocate of the above argument to consider is, in such a case, what happens to the original human being, the embryo we will call Adam? There are only three possib

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective