Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If an individual has freely chosen to use a biomedical en... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Biomedical enhancements are not less authentic than traditional methods of self-improvement.

    If an individual has freely chosen to use a biomedical enhancement on the basis of rational deliberation ('speech and deeds'), the enhancement reflects the individual's agency rather than bypassing it.

    BioethicsMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityBioethics

    Key Terms

    Bypassing (in this context)(as used in philosophy of technology and autonomy)
    Going around or skipping over something—here, it means the enhancement technology is doing something *instead of* the person making a genuine choice.
    Rational deliberation(how the general will is discovered)
    Careful, logical thinking and discussion where people reason through a problem step-by-step rather than acting on emotion or instinct.
    Reflects the individual's agency

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (as used in the statement about enhancement and autonomy)
    Shows that the choice truly came from the person's own thinking and values, rather than someone else controlling them or the technology taking over their decision-making.
    agency(Used to assess whether switching the trolley is deontologically prohibited.)
    A morally relevant sense in which an agent is the direct cause of harm, invoked in deontological constraints; its absence removes a deontological bar to acting.
    biomedical enhancement(Kass 2003, 22)
    An intervention that improves an individual's capacities through biomedical means, distinguished from education, training, and practice in that the subject plays no active role in the mechanism of improvement and cannot understand its effects in human terms.

    Related

    Biomedical enhancements are not less authentic than traditional methods of self-...The same condition of active, comprehensible choice can apply to the decision to...Traditional methods of improving one's capacities are considered authentic becau...

    Similar

    When biomedical enhancements are used, the subject plays no active rol...80%The same condition of active, comprehensible choice can apply to the d...75%The pursuit of human enhancement is morally objectionable because it e...73%Literacy is a non-genetic enhancement that benefits both the literate ...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: enhancement
    View source passageHide passage
    One style of argument for the claim that enhancements undermine authenticity is to contend that we could claim no personal credit for accomplishments that are the result of biomedical enhancements, because the biomedical interventions that caused improvements in our capacities would supersede our own agency in authoring the achievement (Sandel 2007). Defenders of this perspective argue that while, for example, education, training, and practice proceed through “speech and deeds” that are comprehe

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective