Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If appetite merely tracks a perceived good rather than be... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Akrasia (acting against one's better judgment) is possible because some parts of the soul are indifferent to the good and can motivate actions that do not aim at what is good.

    If appetite merely tracks a perceived good rather than being indifferent to goodness, the Platonic partition thesis overstates the soul's division.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Appetite necessarily evaluates its objects as good-for-me, making it inherently responsive to perceived value rather than purely mechanical.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If appetite tracked goodness, conflict between appetite and reason would be rational disagreement about the good, not partition of soul.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Plato's tripartite soul requires appetitive indifference to goodness to justify why appetite resists rational persuasion about true goods.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Appetite's perception of good-for-me differs categorically from reason's perception of the truly good—distinguishing pursuit from understanding.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Soul partition explains why appetite can resist and override rational judgment despite both pursuing 'a' good—they're genuinely opposed forces.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Goodness-tracking doesn't eliminate division; appetite tracks apparent goods while reason tracks real goods, creating structural soul opposition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Akrasia (acting against one's better judgment) is possible because some parts of...Appetite necessarily evaluates its objects as good-for-me, making it inherently ...Appetite's perception of good-for-me differs categorically from reason's percept...Goodness-tracking doesn't eliminate division; appetite tracks apparent goods whi...
    +3 moreShow less
    If appetite tracked goodness, conflict between appetite and reason would be rati...Plato's tripartite soul requires appetitive indifference to goodness to justify ...Soul partition explains why appetite can resist and override rational judgment d...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit