Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If awakening potential is intrinsic to beings, no external bridging act by Buddhas is logically necessary for dharma comprehension.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Intrinsic potential without activation remains unrealized; seeds require soil, water, sunlight to germinate into actual growth.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Beings demonstrate systematic ignorance obscuring their nature; scaffolding (teachings, transmission) logically bridges perception to reality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Logical necessity differs from causal efficacy; even if intrinsic, potential may require catalytic conditions external to itself to manifest.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Beings possess Buddha-nature; awakening is uncovering inherent capacity, not acquiring external properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If dharma comprehension requires external intervention, awakening becomes dependent on contingent factors, undermining liberation's universality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Direct insight into emptiness and interdependence needs no mediator—these truths are logically self-evident upon investigation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.