Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If 'being acted upon' disqualifies genuine agency, then God's reception of prayers and worship would paradoxically compromise divine agency under al-Kindi's own criterion.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Reception need not compromise agency if the agent voluntarily permits or invites the reception as an expression of their own will.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.God's responsive action to prayers demonstrates agency through intelligent deliberation, not passivity—God actively chooses the response.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Al-Kindi distinguished between undergoing change and exercising causal power; receiving prayers need not entail the former.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Al-Kindi's criterion treats all forms of receptivity as agency-compromising without distinguishing voluntary from involuntary reception.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God's nature requires absolute immutability, then receiving prayers (which causally affect divine response) entails real change in God.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Exempting God from the receptivity rule to preserve divine agency proves the criterion is incoherent, not that the objection is invalid.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.