Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If benevolence is a genuine motivational faculty, then moral normativity can extend to others' welfare independently of agent self-interest.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Apparent benevolence may be evolutionary adaptation or hidden self-interest (reputation, group benefit), not genuine motivation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A motivational faculty existing doesn't entail its outputs generate objective moral norms—desires alone lack normative force.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Normativity requires bindingness on all agents; benevolence being selective undermines its claim to universal moral authority.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Benevolence demonstrably moves people to act against self-interest, as shown by parental sacrifice and altruistic rescue.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If a faculty can motivate action, it can ground normative reasons independent of the agent's personal advantage.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Moral systems treating others' welfare as intrinsically valuable are more internally coherent than purely self-interested ones.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.