If CBF is evaluated under a constant-domain semantics rather than varying-domain Kripke semantics, it becomes valid, making unprovability relative to semantic choice, not absolute.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Varying-domain Kripke semantics(as an alternative method of evaluation mentioned in comparison)
A way of interpreting logical statements (developed by philosopher Saul Kripke) where the set of things that exist can change between different situations, and the rules for truth shift accordingly.
semantics(Distinguished from metasemantics and pragmatics in Kaplan 1989)
The domain that concerns the facts about what meanings words or phrases have.
valid(Contrasted with the proof-theoretic notion of deducibility)
A model-theoretic notion indicating that a conclusion is true in every model in which the premises are true