Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If certainty is genuinely grounded in epistemic justifica... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Chisholm's definitions of certainty are flawed because they relativize certainty to a particular subject in a way that produces inconsistent results.

    If certainty is genuinely grounded in epistemic justification, then the same degree of justification should produce the same certainty status for all subjects.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Chisholm's definitions of certainty are flawed because they relativize certainty...This difference arises solely because the second subject happens to have another...Under Chisholm's definitions, two subjects can each believe proposition p with t...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Defining epistemic certainty as 'justified as highly as any belief the...92%Defining epistemic certainty as 'justified as highly as any belief tha...91%Chisholm's definitions of certainty are flawed because they relativize...83%If certainty cannot be grounded discursively or intuitively, it must b...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: certainty
    View source passageHide passage
    There is one further problem with both of Chisholm’s definitions. Because they both relativize certainty to a particular subject, they make possible the following situation. Two subjects each believe that p, and in each case the belief is justified to degree n. For the first subject, the belief counts as certain because none of her other beliefs have a higher level of justification. But, for the second subject, the belief in question is not certain because she does have another belief that is sl

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective