Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If chosen luck is traceable to unchosen luck, then compen... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The resourcist distinction between chosen luck and unchosen luck collapses back into welfarist equality conceptions.

    If chosen luck is traceable to unchosen luck, then compensating only for unchosen luck requires compensating for the outcomes of choices shaped by unchosen luck.

    Justice & PunishmentMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityJustice & Punishment

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The ability to make good or bad choices is itself a product of unchosen genetic ...The resourcist distinction between chosen luck and unchosen luck collapses back ...Welfarist equality conceptions compensate based on welfare outcomes regardless o...

    Similar

    The resourcist distinction between chosen luck and unchosen luck colla...82%Following the underlying logic of the Dworkin proposal consistently re...81%The ability to make good or bad choices is itself a product of unchose...78%What one chooses, bad or good, may simply reflect the unchosen luck th...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: egalitarianism
    View source passageHide passage
    Another sort of skepticism challenges whether the broad project of holding people responsible for their chosen luck but not for their unchosen luck really makes sense, because unchosen luck of genetic inheritance and early socialization fixes the individual's choice-making and value-selecting abilities. What one chooses, bad or good, may simply reflect the unchosen luck that gave one the ability to be a good or a bad chooser. Suppose for example that Smith chooses to experiment with cigarettes a

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective