Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If cognition is self-luminous and self-certifying, its arising requires no external cause beyond prior karmic seeds in the ālayavijñāna.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Self-luminosity claims cognition proves itself, yet circularity remains: cognition cannot certify its own epistemic reliability.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Karmic seeds themselves require origin; ālayavijñāna doesn't escape causation, merely relocates the explanatory burden elsewhere.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Sensory input demonstrably affects cognition; denying external causal factors contradicts observable dependence on environment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Consciousness requires no external validation; its occurrence is directly evident to itself without mediation or proof.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Karmic seeds in ālayavijñāna provide sufficient causal mechanism for cognitive arising without appeal to external generators.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Self-luminosity explains why cognition doesn't require external observer; it manifests its own reality through its nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.